An Analytical Study of Blockchain-Based Intellectual Property Management in Biological Data

Authors

  • Harish Sharma, Dr. Prakash Mathew

Keywords:

Blockchain Technology, Biological Data, Intellectual Property Rights, Data Provenance, Smart Contracts, Bioinformatics Governance

Abstract

The growing dependence on massive biological and bioinformatics datasets has created new obstacles regarding IPR, data ownership and provenance and ethical governance. While traditional IPR considers laws to protect inventions and organised databases, the current state of biological data cannot fully be protected against the challenges of being shared, created collaboratively and changed frequently. Many people suggest that blockchain may be able to address some of these challenges to IPR; however, there is limited analytical research on its actual effectiveness at overcoming many issues regarding biological data. This paper presents an analytical examination of various frameworks for the management of IPR in biological data through the use of blockchain technology. Understanding the major components for example (Provenance tracking, ownership, verification, access control, licensing enforcement, and consent management) within the context of biological data enabled this paper's authors to compare blockchain versus more traditional forms of management systems. Overall, this analysis shows a marked increase in the transparency, traceability, and trust between participants using blockchain to manage IPR in biological data; however, the blockchain is not without some limitations related to the aspects of scale, privacy, and regulatory compliance. Finally, this paper presents both empirical and conceptual support for the proposition that blockchain will be a useful component in managing IPR related to biologically based datasets.

References

Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016). MedRec: Using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. Proceedings of the IEEE Open & Big Data Conference.

Benchoufi, M., & Ravaud, P. (2017). Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality. Trials, 18, 335.

Erlich, Y., & Narayanan, A. (2014). Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15(6), 409–421.

Marx, V. (2013). Biology: The big challenges of big data. Nature, 498(7453), 255–260.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Reichman, J. H., Okediji, R. L., & Gervais, D. J. (2016). Database protection and innovation: An international perspective. Oxford University Press.

Shabani, M., & Marelli, L. (2019). Re-identifiability of genomic data and the GDPR. EMBO Reports, 20(6), e48316.

Stephens, Z. D., et al. (2015). Big data: Astronomical or genomical? PLoS Biology, 13(7), e1002195.

Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9).

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution. Penguin Random House.

Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology? PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0163477.

Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352–375.

Downloads

How to Cite

Harish Sharma, Dr. Prakash Mathew. (2022). An Analytical Study of Blockchain-Based Intellectual Property Management in Biological Data. International Journal of Research & Technology, 10(3), 87–96. Retrieved from https://ijrt.org/j/article/view/904

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.