A Study of Teacher Education Reforms Suggested in NEP 2020 for Improving Professional Standards

Authors

  • Laxman Sakharam Wayal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64882/ijrt.v12.i4.864

Keywords:

Teacher Education, NEP 2020, Professional Standards, Teacher Preparation, Continuous Professional Development, Educational Reform, Teacher Quality, Professionalization of Teaching

Abstract

Teacher education reform constitutes a central pillar of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, reflecting the policy’s recognition that high-quality schooling and improved learning outcomes depend fundamentally on the professional capacity, pedagogical competence, ethical grounding, and subject mastery of teachers across all stages of education in India. This review paper critically examines the teacher education reforms proposed in NEP 2020, analyzing their intent, scope, and anticipated impact on elevating professional standards within the Indian educational system. Drawing on research from educational policy analysis, teacher development theory, pedagogical practice studies, comparative international frameworks, professionalization discourse, competency-based readiness models, and instructional quality research, the study explores how NEP 2020 proposes to transform teacher recruitment, pre-service preparation, licensing norms, continuous professional development, performance evaluation, mentoring systems, and institutional regulation. The review highlights NEP 2020’s introduction of a four-year integrated teacher education program, National Professional Standards for Teachers, strengthened accreditation mechanisms, practice-based training requirements, and career progression pathways aimed at professionalizing teaching and aligning educator capability with global benchmarks. The findings demonstrate that NEP 2020 positions teachers not as content transmitters but as facilitators of experiential learning, holistic development, inclusive education, multilingual pedagogy, and competency-based classroom environments, requiring a fundamental reorientation of teacher identity, instructional autonomy, and reflective practice.

References

Agrawal, M. (2020). Teacher Education Reforms in NEP 2020: Policy Implications and Professional Standards. Indian Journal of Education Policy, 15(2), 45–67.

Alexander, R. (2010). Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Blackwell Publishing.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered Educators: How High-Performing Systems Shape Teaching Quality Around the World. Jossey-Bass.

Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education, New Delhi.

Heugh, K. (2018). Multilingual teacher preparation and professional development. Journal of Language and Education, 44(2), 31–48.

Joshi, A. (2021). Competency-based teacher standards and NEP 2020 implementation. Policy and Education Review, 16(4), 102–129.

Kaur, P. (2020). Teacher professional development and NEP reforms. Indian Journal of Pedagogical Studies, 28(3), 77–98.

Kumar, K. (2005). Political Agenda of Education. Sage Publications.

Little, A. (2020). International teacher education frameworks and quality assurance. Comparative Education Studies, 55(2), 147–168.

NCTE. (2021). Teacher Education Guidelines and Accreditation Framework. National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi.

NCERT. (2021). Curricular Alignment for Teacher Education Under NEP 2020. National Council of Educational Research and Training.

OECD. (2019). Teaching and Learning International Survey: Teacher Professionalism Indicators. OECD Publishing.

Downloads

How to Cite

Laxman Sakharam Wayal. (2024). A Study of Teacher Education Reforms Suggested in NEP 2020 for Improving Professional Standards. International Journal of Research & Technology, 12(4), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.64882/ijrt.v12.i4.864

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.