India’s Green Finance Taxonomy: A Comparative Assessment with Global Standards

Authors

  • Miss Richa Singh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64882/ijrt.v14.iS1.984

Keywords:

Green finance, green taxonomy, sustainable finance, global standards, India

Abstract

The importance of green finance has significantly increased, due to growing urgency of climate change and sustainable development. Green finance act as an important mechanism to mobilize capital toward environmentally sustainable activities. A comprehensive taxonomy is essential to identifies and categorizes appropriate green economic activities, thereby enhancing transparency and reducing the possibility of green washing. As a means to define environmentally sustainable economic activity and direct financial flows toward climate-resilient development, green finance taxonomies are crucial. Green finance taxonomies act as an outline for institutions and, investors providing common definitions for sustainable assets, with pillars typically involving the company’s significant environmental contribution, avoidance of considerable harm, and social safeguards. Several nations throughout the globe have developed structured green finance taxonomies, such as China’s Green Bond Endorsed Project Catalogue and the European Union (EU) Green Taxonomy, which offers comprehensive technical screening criteria and disclosure requirements. The green finance ecosystem is evolving significantly in India, with strong support from regulatory measures, such as the issuance of sovereign green bonds, and improved sustainability reporting requirements for businesses and financial institutions. However, the absence of comprehensive and unified global green finance taxonomy raises issues such as uniformity, consistency, comparability, and global coherence.

This research paper aims to analyse India’s new green finance taxonomy and determine its alignment with leading global green finance taxonomy standards. The study utilizes a descriptive and comparative methodology that is entirely based on secondary data drawn from reports, policy documents, and regulatory frameworks published by international organizations such as World Bank, OECD, and European Commission as well as Indian institutions such as the Reserve Bank of India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Criteria for technical screening, standards disclosure requirements, sectors covered in taxonomy and the application of the "Do No Significant Harm" principle are the key aspects of comparison in this research paper.

The finding of this study discloses that India's green finance framework partially aligns with international standards, particularly in areas like clean transportation and renewable energy; however, it is still primarily principle-based and lacks specific technical thresholds and uniform disclosure requirements. Furthermore, this research paper concludes that grater alignment with international green finance taxonomies would boost investor confidence, increase market transparency, and strengthen India's entry into global sustainable finance markets. To support the development of robust and internationally aligned green finance taxonomy for India, policy recommendations are proposed in this paper.

References

Agarwal, C., & Rai, P. (2025, October 15). Environmental wisdom and sustainable practices. In Bridging ideas: A multidisciplinary approach to knowledge and innovation (pp. 76–85). Eagle Leap Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

Alessi, L., Ossola, E., and Panzica, R., (2021). “What Greenium Matters in the European Green Bond Market,” Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 54, pp. 100868–100878.

Boffo, R., and Patalano, R., (2020). ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges, OECD Publishing, Paris, pp. 1–45.

Chen, Y., Li, J., and Wang, Z., (2020). “China’s Green Bond Market and Its Alignment with International Standards,” Energy Policy, Vol. 145, pp. 111–125.

European Commission, (2022). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 Supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852, Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, pp. 1–67.

European Commission, (2023). EU Taxonomy: Final Report on Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, European Union, Brussels, pp. 1–120.

Khushbu, & Agarwal, C. (2025). Green banking in the digital age: Transforming finance to sustainable finance. In Industry 5.0: Sustainable business practices for a bright future (pp. 225–247). Nova Science Publishers.

Narain, U., and Vaze, P., (2021). “Greening India’s Financial System: Opportunities and Challenges,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 56, No. 38, pp. 45–52.

Ng, A. W., (2018). “From Sustainability Accounting to a Green Finance System: Institutional Legitimacy and Market Formation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 200, pp. 993–1004.

People’s Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, and China Securities Regulatory Commission, (2021). Green Bond Endorsed Project Catalogue (2021 Edition), Beijing, pp. 1–75.

pp. 122–126). Eagle Leap Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

Rai, P., Jaiswal, R., Singh, P., & Singh, A. K. (2024). Trends and Prospects for Artificial Intelligence in Business and Economics Research. International Journal of Innovations in Science, Engineering And Management, 341-344

Reserve Bank of India, (2022). Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India, RBI Publications, Mumbai, pp. 112–140.

Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., and Fuller, G., (2019). Sustainable Development Report 2019, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–60.

Schoenmaker, D., and Schramade, W., (2019). Principles of Sustainable Finance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 85–110.

Securities and Exchange Board of India, (2021). Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR), SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD-2/P/CIR/2021/562, Mumbai, pp. 1–24.

Shrivastava, S., & Kumar, P. (2020). Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Solutions Applied to Economic Load Dispatch Problem. In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Electrical Engineering (pp. 210-229). IGI Global Scientific Publishing

Ziolo, M., Filipiak, B. Z., Bak, I., and Cheba, K., (2021). “How to Design More Sustainable Financial Systems: The Roles of Taxonomy and Transparency,” Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1–18.

Downloads

How to Cite

Miss Richa Singh. (2026). India’s Green Finance Taxonomy: A Comparative Assessment with Global Standards. International Journal of Research & Technology, 14(S1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.64882/ijrt.v14.iS1.984

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.