The Impact of Community-Based Organisations on Rural Development: A Survey-Based Study
Keywords:
Community-Based Organisations (CBOs), Rural Development, Socio-Economic Development, Environmental Conservation, Community Empowerment, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract
This study investigates the role of community-based organisations (CBOs) in rural development, focusing on their contributions to socio-economic development, environmental conservation, and community empowerment. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative data from 500 households across five rural communities with qualitative insights from interviews with CBO leaders and members. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between community participation in CBO-led initiatives and improved socio-economic conditions, enhanced environmental sustainability, and increased community empowerment. These outcomes highlight the critical role of CBOs in leveraging local knowledge and resources for sustainable development. However, the study also identifies challenges, including funding limitations and the need for technical expertise, that constrain the effectiveness and scalability of CBO initiatives. The research underscores the importance of fostering supportive ecosystems for CBOs, involving collaborations with governmental and non-governmental organisations, to enhance their impact on rural development. This study contributes to the discourse on sustainable development by emphasising the pivotal role of community-based approaches in addressing rural communities' multifaceted challenges.
References
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.
Banerjee, A., Banerji, R., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Khemani, S. (2010). Pitfalls of participatory programmes: Evidence from a randomised evaluation in education in India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1), 1–30.
Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalised world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15188–15193.
Choguill, C. L. (1996). A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International, 20(3), 431-444.
Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency, and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 36–55). Zed Books.
Cornwall, A. (2002). Making spaces, changing places: situating participation in development. IDS Bulletin, 33(4), 1–10.
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and community-driven development: A critical review. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 1-39.
Narayan, D. (2002). Empowerment and poverty reduction: A sourcebook. World Bank Publications
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209–227
Rifkin, S. B. (2009). Lessons from community participation in health programmes. Health Policy and Planning, 24(8), 541–549.
Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the Poor: Micro-lending and the Battle Against World Poverty. Public Affairs.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
