The Role of Agricultural Policy in Promoting Financial Stability: A Cross-Country Comparative Study

Authors

  • Shantanu

Keywords:

Agricultural Policy, Financial Stability, India, Latvia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Ghana, Ireland, England, Common Agricultural Policy, MSP, Food Security, Rural Development, Sustainable Agriculture, Economic Growth, Climate Resilience.

Abstract

Agriculture remains a fundamental sector for economic growth, food security, employment generation, rural development, and financial stability across both developed and developing economies. This study examines the relationship between agricultural policy and financial stability through a comparative analysis of India, Latvia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Ghana, Ireland, and England (United Kingdom). The research evaluates how different agricultural policy frameworks influence farm incomes, agricultural productivity, employment, inflation, trade performance, environmental sustainability, and overall macroeconomic stability.

The study adopts a comparative and descriptive research approach based on secondary data collected from government reports, policy documents, international organizations, and agricultural statistics. The analysis covers major agricultural policy instruments including price support systems, direct income transfers, input subsidies, agricultural credit programmes, crop insurance schemes, trade policies, environmental incentives, and rural development initiatives. Particular attention is given to India's Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and PM-KISAN programme, Latvia’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) support mechanisms, Bangladesh’s Program on Agricultural and Rural Transformation for Nutrition, Entrepreneurship, and Resilience (PARTNER), Brazil’s climate-smart agricultural policies under Plano Safra, Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs (PFJ 2.0) programme, Ireland’s Food Vision 2030 strategy, and England’s Environmental Land Management (ELM) framework.

The findings indicate that agricultural policy significantly contributes to financial stability through multiple channels, including income protection, inflation management, employment generation, export growth, and investment promotion. India relies heavily on domestic intervention through MSP, subsidies, procurement systems, and direct income support to stabilize agricultural markets and rural consumption. Latvia benefits from institutional and financial support provided through the European Union’s CAP framework, which promotes farm competitiveness, rural development, and environmental sustainability. Bangladesh is gradually transforming its agricultural support system from traditional input subsidies toward climate-resilient and diversification-oriented policies. Brazil has increasingly linked agricultural credit and subsidies to climate-smart agricultural practices, while Ghana has adopted innovative digital and credit-based agricultural support mechanisms. Ireland and England have shifted agricultural policy toward sustainability, climate resilience, biodiversity conservation, and environmental stewardship while maintaining agricultural competitiveness. The study finds that countries with well-designed agricultural support systems experience greater income stability, improved resilience to market and climate shocks, enhanced food security, and stronger rural development outcomes. Although the contribution of agriculture to GDP varies considerably across the selected countries, the sector continues to play an essential role in promoting economic resilience and financial stability. The comparative analysis confirms that agricultural policy remains a critical instrument for balancing productivity growth, environmental sustainability, rural welfare, and macroeconomic stability.

The study concludes that future agricultural policy should focus on strengthening climate resilience, improving productivity, promoting sustainable resource management, encouraging innovation, and enhancing market efficiency. Policymakers should pursue integrated agricultural strategies that simultaneously support economic growth, environmental sustainability, food security, and financial stability. Such approaches are essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability and resilience of agricultural systems in an increasingly uncertain global environment.

References

Gautam, M., Laborde, D., Mamun, A., Martin, W., Valeria, P. et al. 2022. Repurposing Agricultural Policies and Support: Options to Transform Agriculture and Food Systems to Better Serve the Health of People, Economies, and the Planet. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.Three schemes are available to pay for environmental and climate goods and services

[3] Gulati, A., D. Kapur and M. Bouton (2020), “Reforming Indian Agriculture”, Economic & Political Weekly, Vol. 55/11, https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/11/special-articles/reforming-indian-agriculture.html (accessed on 15 March 2020).

[2] ICRIER (2022), Background Analysis for India chapter in Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation Reports.

[1] OECD/ICRIER (2018), Agricultural Policies in India, OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302334-en.

Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. (2023). National Soils Advocates. Available at: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/agriculture-land/farm-food-drought/natural-resources/soils/national-soils-advocate

Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE). (2021). National Soil Strategy. Available at: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-soil-strategy.pdf

British Society of Soil Science. (2023). Soil Health Inquiry – Response. Available at: https://soils.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Soil-Health-Inquiry-2023-Final-1.pdf

Campbell, B., et al. (forthcoming). From Input Subsidies to Compensating Farmers for Soil Health Services. GIZ.

Coalition of Action 4 Soil Health (CA4SH). (Undated). CA4SH Brochure. Available at: https://www.coalitionforsoilhealth.org

de Bruyn, L., Jenkins, A., & Samson-Liebig, S. (2017). Lessons learnt: Sharing soil knowledge to improve land management and sustainable soil use. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81, 427–438. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.12.0403

European Commission. (2023). Cross-compliance under the Common Agricultural Policy. Available at: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/income-support/cross-compliance_en

FAO. (2020). Towards a Definition of Soil Health. Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils (ITPS) Soil Letters #1. Rome: FAO.

FAO. (2021). Assessment of Agricultural Plastics and Their Sustainability: A Call for Action. Rome: FAO.

Gautam, M., Laborde, D., Mamun, A., Martin, W., Valeria, P., et al. (2022). Repurposing Agricultural Policies and Support: Options to Transform Agriculture and Food Systems to Better Serve the Health of People, Economies, and the Planet. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Gulati, A., Kapur, D., & Bouton, M. (2020). Reforming Indian Agriculture. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(11). Available at: https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/11/special-articles/reforming-indian-agriculture.html

ICRIER. (2022). Background Analysis for India Chapter in Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation Reports.

IPCC. (2019). Special Report: Climate Change and Land. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/

Lal, R., Bouma, J., Brevik, E., Dawson, L., Field, D., et al. (2021). Soils and Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations: An International Union of Soil Sciences Perspective. Geoderma Regional, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398

Lamanna, C. (2018). Enhancing Soil Organic Carbon with Agricultural Residues. Available at: https://www.ctc-n.org/sites/www.ctc-n.org/files/7._enhancing_soil_organic_carbon_with_agricultural_residues_0.pdf

Masikati, P., Mwanza, M., Aynekulu, E., Vagen, T.-G., & Winowiecki, L. (2022). Including Soil Organic Carbon into Nationally Determined Contributions: Insights from Zambia. AICCRA Policy Brief. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/126512

OECD/ICRIER. (2018). Agricultural Policies in India. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302334-en

Ogle, S., Swan, A., & Paustian, K. (2012). No-till Management Impacts on Crop Productivity, Carbon Input and Soil Carbon Sequestration. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 149, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.010

Payton, L. (2016). Seven Ways to Save Our Soils. Soil Association. Available at: https://www.soilassociation.org/media/4672/7-ways-to-save-our-soils-2016.pdf

Peake, L., & Robb, C. (2022). The Global Standard Bearers of Soil Governance. Soil Security, 6, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100055

Pittelkow, C., Liang, X., Linquist, B., van Groenigen, K., Lee, J., et al. (2015). Productivity Limits and Potentials of the Principles of Conservation Agriculture. Nature, 517(7534), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13809

Reddy, A. (2019). The Soil Health Card Scheme in India: Lessons Learned and Challenges for Replication in Other Developing Countries. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 9(2), 124–156. https://doi.org/10.5325/naturesopolirese.9.2.0124

Soil Health Institute. (Undated). Recommended Measurements for Scaling Soil Health Assessments. Available at: https://soilhealthinstitute.org/app/uploads/2022/10/SHI_SoilHealthMeasurements_factsheet.pdf

Vågen, T.-G., & Winowiecki, L. (2019). Predicting the Spatial Distribution and Severity of Soil Erosion in the Global Tropics Using Satellite Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 11(15), 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151800

World Agroforestry. (2023). The Land Degradation Surveillance Framework Field Manual. Available at: https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/25533/

European Commission. (2022). Latvia CAP Strategic Plan 2023–2027. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission. (2023). Cross-compliance under the Common Agricultural Policy. Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/income-support/cross-compliance_en

FAO. (2025). FAOSTAT Database. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Gautam, M., Laborde, D., Mamun, A., Martin, W., Valeria, P., et al. (2022). Repurposing Agricultural Policies and Support: Options to Transform Agriculture and Food Systems to Better Serve the Health of People, Economies, and the Planet. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Government of India. (2024). Agricultural Export Policy and Agricultural Statistics 2024. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.

Government of India. (2025). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2025. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.

Government of India. (2025). Economic Survey 2024–25. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.

Gulati, A., Kapur, D., & Bouton, M. (2020). Reforming Indian Agriculture. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(11). Retrieved from https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/11/special-articles/reforming-indian-agriculture.html

ICRIER. (2022). Background Analysis for India Chapter in Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation Reports. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

Ministry of Agriculture of Latvia. (2025). Agriculture and Rural Development Report 2025. Riga: Ministry of Agriculture.

Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (2025). Annual Report 2024–25. New Delhi: Government of India.

OECD. (2025). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2025. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OECD/ICRIER. (2018). Agricultural Policies in India. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302334-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation Report: India. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Upite, I. (2009). Development of the Common Agricultural Policy and Rural Development in Latvia. Riga: Latvia University of Agriculture.

World Bank. (2023). Agriculture Policy Dialogue: Policy Pathways for Sustainable Agriculture. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. (2024). Program on Agricultural and Rural Transformation for Nutrition, Entrepreneurship and Resilience (PARTNER): Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. (2024). Sustainable Multiple Use Landscape Consortia in Brazil. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Downloads

How to Cite

Shantanu. (2026). The Role of Agricultural Policy in Promoting Financial Stability: A Cross-Country Comparative Study. International Journal of Research & Technology, 14(1), 852–893. Retrieved from https://ijrt.org/j/article/view/1362

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.