Blockchain Adoption Challenges and Enablers in Indian Financial Institutions: An Empirical Investigation Using TOE Framework

Authors

  • Shivani Agarwal, Prof. (Dr.) Vipin Jain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64882/ijrt.v14.iS1.1113

Keywords:

Blockchain Adoption, Financial Institutions, TOE Framework, PLS-SEM, Emerging Economies, SmartPLS

Abstract

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative digital innovation with the potential to enhance transparency, security, efficiency, and trust in financial transactions. Despite increasing academic and industry interest, blockchain adoption among financial institutions remains limited, particularly in emerging economies such as India. This study examines the key challenges and enablers influencing blockchain adoption in Indian financial institutions by employing the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework. A quantitative, explanatory research design was adopted, and primary data were collected from managers, IT heads, and compliance officers working in banks, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), and fintech firms. The data were analysed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS software. The empirical findings indicate that organizational factors specifically top management support, organizational readiness, and employee competence exert the strongest influence on blockchain adoption intention, followed by technological factors such as security assurance and system integration compatibility. Environmental factors, including regulatory support and competitive pressure, also significantly affect adoption decisions, while market uncertainty acts as a deterrent. The study provides robust empirical validation of the TOE framework in the blockchain context and extends organizational technology adoption literature by offering context-specific insights from the Indian financial sector. The findings have important implications for policymakers, regulators, and financial institutions aiming to design effective strategies for blockchain implementation.

References

Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36(2), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006

Chahal, D., & Rani, A. (2024). Productive and decent work employment opportunities: Reflections of Sustainable Development Goal 8. Journal Space and Culture, India, 11, 90-101.

Chaudhary, D., Singh, J., Singh, J., Chahal, J., & Molla, K. Z. (2024, March). Data analytics to find impact of religion on tourism in India. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2816, No. 1, p. 110002). AIP Publishing LLC.

Dwivedi, R., & Hasan, N. (2025). Enhancing brand awareness and loyalty through gamification in the metaverse. In Addressing Practical Problems Through the Metaverse and Game-Inspired Mechanics (pp. 259-288). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Gupta, S., & Kushwaha, P. S. (2024). Exploring the critical drivers of blockchain technology adoption in Indian industries using the best–worst method. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Advance online publication.

Gupta, S., & Sahu, G. P. (2022). Factors of blockchain adoption for FinTech sector: An interpretive structural modelling approach. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 11(3), 179–194.

Hasan N, Agarwal C, Joshi A, Rahal D, Traisa R, Sharma S (2025;), "The two-way influence of green banking practices and green electronic word of mouth in driving green trust and green loyalty: a trust transfer perspective". International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2024-0326

Hasan, N., Nanda, S., Agarwal, M.K. et al. Evaluating the mediating effect of financial literacy between fintech adoption in microfinance services. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02256-4

Hasan, N., Singh, A. K., & Dwivedi, R. (2024). Determinants of FinTech adoption by microfinance institutions in India to increase efficiency and productivity. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 35(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2024.142306

Hasan, N., Singh, A. K., & Tariq, H. (2020). Sustainability and outreach of microfinance institutions in India. Shodh Sarita, 9(7). http://shabdbooks.com/Vol-9-Issue-7-2020/

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88

Iansiti, M., & Lakhasni, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118–127.

Khanna, P., & Haldar, A. (2022). Will adoption of blockchain technology be challenging? Evidence from Indian banking industry. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(5), 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-01-2022-0003

Kshetri, N. (2017). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005

Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005

Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information & Management, 38(8), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00073-8

Mainelli, M., & Smith, M. (2015). Sharing ledgers for sharing economies: An exploration of mutual distributed ledgers (blockchain technology). Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3), 38–58.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.

Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.

Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT adoption to assimilation: A longitudinal study of PLM system implementation. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 559–586.

Peters, G. W., & Panayi, E. (2016). Understanding modern banking ledgers through blockchain technologies: Future of transaction processing and smart contracts on the Internet of Money. In P. Tasca et al. (Eds.), Banking beyond banks and money (pp. 239–278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42448-4_13

Peters, G. W., Panayi, E., & Chapelle, A. (2015). Trends in crypto-currencies and blockchain technologies: A monetary theory and regulation perspective. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3), 1–43.

Puschmann, T. (2017). Fintech. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0464-6

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Hughes, D. L. (2022). Analysis of challenges for blockchain adoption within the Indian public sector: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Information Technology & People, 35(2), 548–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2020-0460

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Saurabh, S., & Dey, K. (2022). Barriers to blockchain adoption for supply chain finance: The case of Indian SMEs. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(2), 303–340.

Singh, K., Nagpal, N., Midha, S., & Chahal, D. (2025). A Shorter Version of the Happiness-Increasing Strategies Scale in the Indian Context. SAGE Open, 15(2), 21582440251336511.

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin Random House.

Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.

Thong, J. Y. L. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.

Tornatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.

Wadhawan,D.N., C. S. A. K.(2023). The evolving landscape of digital marketing: Trends, impacts, and opportunities in India. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 38(2), 2157–2168.

Wadhawan,N., R. K. A. (2020). Understanding e-commerce: A study with reference to competitive economy. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 805–809.

Yadav, V. S., Singh, A., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2021). Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains: Examining the impact of barriers in an emerging economy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1044–1069. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0086

Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?—A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0163477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163477

Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review. PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0163477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163477

Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84.

Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576.

Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 155–178.

Downloads

How to Cite

Shivani Agarwal, Prof. (Dr.) Vipin Jain. (2026). Blockchain Adoption Challenges and Enablers in Indian Financial Institutions: An Empirical Investigation Using TOE Framework. International Journal of Research & Technology, 14(S1), 754–775. https://doi.org/10.64882/ijrt.v14.iS1.1113

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.